Miso Clinic Daegu · Clinical column

Rejuran in Daegu: seven things to check before choosing a clinic

If you searched for the best clinic for Rejuran in Daegu, take the criteria rather than a name. No public metric compares injector skill. But three facts are checkable: Rejuran comes in three formulations, all three controlled human trials failed to show a difference from their comparator, and the pivotal Korean approval trial was retracted in 2016. How a clinic handles those three is something anyone can compare.

Clinical column 12 min September 2026 Miso Clinic Daegu · Dr Lee Chi-Hak

The short answer

Rejuran is a skin booster of polynucleotides (PN) purified from salmonid milt, approved in Korea as a medical device. Stated precisely: three controlled split-face trials (27, 30 and 15 subjects) all reported no significant difference from the comparator on the main aesthetic scales; the systematic review rated the nine included studies (219 patients) as low to moderate quality; and the Korean approval phase 3 that was long cited as the evidence was retracted in 2016. So what to check in consultation is not “how good is it” but “what are you citing”.

1. Do they name the formulation first?

Rejuran is not one product. It is usually divided into Healer, HB and HB Plus, which differ in what they target and how they feel. The HB line contains hyaluronic acid, so it shows less immediately after injection; HB Plus contains lidocaine, so pain usually eases as the session proceeds.

If the consultation ends with “we'll do Rejuran” and no formulation is named, ask. They are not the same price and not the same result. Details are on the Rejuran product page.

2. Do they say where the session interval comes from?

The commonly quoted design is three to four sessions at two to four week intervals. Those numbers have different origins.

  • Two-week intervals, three sessions — the protocol the Korean approval phase 3 actually used. That paper has been retracted.
  • Four-week intervals — proposed by a 2026 expert opinion paper which states it is based on the authors' clinical experience. Some authors are employed by the manufacturer.
  • A trial comparing session counts in humans — we could not find one.

So there is no basis for calling three sessions correct. A clinic that separates what came from a trial from what is convention is the more accurate one.

3. Do they explain the bumps, with numbers, beforehand?

Rejuran leaves raised points where it was injected. This is a physical swelling of fluid sitting in the dermis, not the nodule seen with particulate products, and the literature reports it settling within a day or two.

How often it happens varies a lot by formulation. In a 2025 split-face trial (15 subjects), embossing occurred in 56.7% with the conventional formulation and 13.3% with an ionization-adjusted one; erythema was 60% versus 40%; injection pain was VAS 5.04 versus 3.39 (p < 0.005). Wrinkle scores (CFGS, GAIS) did not differ between the two.

A clinic that brings these numbers into consultation is at least prepared to tell you that your face on the day is not the result. Detail is in Rejuran bumps: why they form and how long.

4. What do they cite when they talk about evidence?

This is the most practical item here. Two sentences are still in wide circulation in Korean clinic material: “it passed a phase 3 with 72 enrolled and 70 analysed” and “95.7% improvement”.

The paper those numbers come from (J Korean Med Sci 2014;29(Suppl 3):S201–S209) was retracted in 2016 (notice: same journal, 2016;31(2):330). PubMed lists its publication type as Retracted Publication. And before retraction, its own abstract stated that the primary and secondary efficacy measures showed no statistical significance versus the control.

We were citing that paper on several pages ourselves and corrected all of them in September 2026. The checking method and the other retracted papers are in The citation stays after the paper is gone.

Wherever you consult, ask once: “which paper does that number come from?” If you get an answer you can verify it on PubMed in five minutes. If you do not, that is information too.

5. Do they assess the skin before naming a product?

Rejuran is not a volumiser. It targets dermal density, texture and the repair environment. If hollow cheeks are the main concern and a Rejuran course is booked anyway, finishing every session will not produce the change you wanted.

So the order matters: what has been lost (density or volume), and how much descent there is, before any product is named. Which skin is a candidate is tabulated in Rejuran in Daegu: which skin suits it.

6. Do they ask what is already in the area?

Layering onto an area that already contains GOURI (liquid PCL), Sculptra (PLLA) or Radiesse (CaHA) deserves caution. Those materials are not dissolved by hyaluronidase, so if a problem appears later the cause cannot be separated.

Rejuran itself degrades, so dissolving does not apply. But a clinic that moves to a plan without asking your treatment history is worth questioning on that point. Family differences are in CellREDM and Re2O vs Rejuran and GOURI and Rejuran.

7. Do they tell you what to do if something happens?

Reported adverse events in the PN family are generally mild and transient. A 2026 expert opinion paper states that no granuloma or vascular occlusion has been reported in the literature — while the same paper notes the evidence base remains limited.

What matters is not a clinic that says there are no side effects, but one that tells you when to come back. Whether swelling and bumps are within the expected range, and after how many days you should call.

How we decide

  1. What has been lost — dermal density, volume, or descent. Rejuran answers only the first.
  2. Then the formulation — pain sensitivity, your schedule after the session, and the area (periocular or full face).
  3. Sessions, with the source stated — we suggest three to four sessions at three to four week intervals, and we say plainly that this is the common Korean design rather than a trial result.
  4. Bumps and downtime first — starting from the fact that your face on the day is not the result.
  5. Declining is also a decision — if volume is the main problem, we do not recommend Rejuran.

What we do not do: we do not present before-and-after photographs as evidence (Medical Service Act Article 56(2)), we do not put prices in these columns, and we do not cite numbers from a retracted paper.

Frequently asked

Which clinic in Daegu is best for Rejuran?

Public data cannot answer that. No metric comparing injector skill is published, testimonials cannot serve as evidence of efficacy under Article 56(2) of the Korean Medical Service Act, and case volume is not the same as skill. The seven items above are what you can compare.

If the phase 3 was retracted, does Rejuran not work?

No. Retraction is a judgment about the paper, not the product, and Rejuran remains an approved medical device in Korea. What changed is that its numbers can no longer be cited. Non-retracted studies exist but are small with short follow-up.

Healer, HB or HB Plus — which?

We could not find a trial comparing the three under the same conditions. So the choice is about conditions, not superiority: pain sensitivity, your schedule afterwards, and the area.

How many sessions?

The common design is three to four sessions at two to four week intervals. No trial comparing session counts in humans was found, so there is no basis for calling three correct. We state that our guidance is convention, not a trial result.

Are the bumps on the day a complication?

Usually not. They are physical swelling of fluid in the dermis and the literature reports them settling in a day or two. In a 15-subject trial the rate was 56.7% versus 13.3% depending on formulation.

Is it more natural because it is salmon DNA?

We know of no data showing that the origin of an ingredient determines how natural the result looks. Evidence comes from trial results, and the PN trials repeatedly report no difference from their comparator.

Can I have it with GOURI or Re2O?

Separating area or timing makes it possible. But layering onto irreversible material (PCL, PLLA, CaHA) deserves caution because the cause of any later problem cannot be separated. We found no trial data on combining them.

Will it fill hollow cheeks?

No. Rejuran is not designed to add volume; it targets dermal density and texture. If lost volume is the main concern, this is the wrong direction.

Read next

Who wrote this

Lee Chi-Hak, Director, Miso Clinic Daegu

4F Bombom Building, 125 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, Korea (Exit 1, Kyungpook National University Hospital Station)

+82-53-428-2700 · www.clinicmiso.co.kr

References

  1. Lampridou S, Bassett S, Cavallini M, Christopoulos G. The Effectiveness of Polynucleotides in Esthetic Medicine: A Systematic Review. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025;24(2):e16721. PMID 39645667 (9 studies, 219 patients, low to moderate quality)
  2. Lee YJ, et al. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33(1):254-260. PMID 32248707 (27 subjects, no significant difference on VAS or GAIS)
  3. Jeong GJ, et al. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(7):1593-1599. PMID 31680395 (30 subjects, no significant difference at 12 weeks)
  4. Jeon W, et al. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025;50(7):2723-2730. PMID 41361144 (15 subjects; embossing 13.3% vs 56.7%, pain VAS 3.39 vs 5.04)
  5. Rho NK, et al. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2026;19:557226. PMID 41939258 (expert opinion; some authors employed by the manufacturer)
  6. Pak CS, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2014;29(Suppl 3):S201-S209. PMID 25473210 — Retracted Publication / Notice of Retraction: 2016;31(2):330. PMID 26839493

What we could not verify

  • The class, intended use and approval date in Rejuran's original Korean approval document.
  • The published molecular weight of Rejuran's PN.
  • A trial comparing Healer, HB and HB Plus under the same conditions.
  • A trial comparing session counts in humans.
  • Any public metric comparing case volume or skill across clinics in Daegu — none exists.

This is general medical information and does not replace consultation. It is not intended to compare or disparage particular clinics; the retraction status of every paper cited is public information anyone can verify on PubMed. Indications and methods depend on individual skin condition and should be decided after an in-person consultation. Prices and promotions are not covered.

← Clinical columns · Reference library · Miso Clinic Daegu

한국어 · English