Miso Clinic · Clinical column

How long do Density and XERF last? — how to decide when to retreat

“How many months will it last?” is the question we hear most. Online, “six months to a year” is a common answer, but no human data have followed Density or XERF for that long. This column separates what has been measured from what is simply custom.

Clinical column About 5 min September 2026 Miso Clinic, Daegu · Dr. Lee Chi-Hak, Medical Director

The short answer

How long Density and XERF last cannot be answered from device data. Human follow-up ended at 24 weeks for Density and at 90 days at most for XERF. For RF lifting in general, device-measured elasticity was significant from 4 weeks and clinical assessment at 12 weeks; some studies put the peak at four to six months and one reported a slight decline at seven to ten months, but most of these used older devices and none had a control group. So Miso Clinic decides Density or XERF retreatment from the state of the face after the two-to-three-month assessment, not from a calendar, and sets no fixed “so many times a year”.

How many months have Density and XERF results been measured for?

Density and XERF — follow-up in human data
DeviceStudyLast measurement
Density (Jeisys Medical)Oku 2025 · 16 people24 weeks
XERF (Lutronic)Hwang 2025 · 20 people12 weeks
XERF (Lutronic)Weiss 2026 · 39 people90 days
XERF (Lutronic)Erlich 2026 · 16 people3 months

What happens after 24 weeks for Density and after 90 days for XERF has never been measured for either device. When you see “lasts a year”, it is more accurate to ask which device, how many people and whether there was a control group.

When do RF lifting results such as Density and XERF appear, and when do they fade?

  1. Right afterTight feelingImmediate collagen contraction and swelling — it settles soon and is not counted as a result.
  2. 4 weeksDevice-measured elasticityIn a study of 20 Korean women, device-measured elasticity was significant from 4 weeks, but clinical assessment was not yet significant.
  3. 12 weeksClinical assessment significantIn the same study, jawline and nasolabial fold improvement became significant at 12 weeks and held to 24 weeks.
  4. 4–6 monthsPeak (older-device studies)Two independent studies reported the peak at four to six months.
  5. 7–10 monthsSlight decline (one study)Data after this point are thinner still.

This RF lifting timeline comes from monopolar RF studies that did not use Density or XERF and had no control groups. We do not turn it into a duration for Density or XERF.

Is the feeling that Density or XERF has “worn off” accurate?

The same result at the same time point looks different depending on who assesses it. In a review of 16 ultrasound lifting studies, practitioners judged 92% improved at 90 days but patients judged 42%. In the other direction, in a one-year study (20 people) blinded observers rated only 43% improved while patient satisfaction was 95–100%, and quantified lift peaked at 90 days and fell to 22–33% at one year.

So the feeling that Density or XERF has “worn off”, or that it is “still there”, can both differ from measurement. That is why Miso Clinic takes photos under fixed conditions before treatment and retakes them under the same conditions for comparison.

How is the timing of Density or XERF retreatment decided?

Density and XERF retreatment decisions (clinical judgement)
SituationDecision
Less than 2–3 months since Density or XERFPostpone the decision — change is still under way
Sagging remains at the 2–3 month assessmentPlan the same device or a different one
Density or XERF change feels maintainedNo rush — the pace of ageing differs between people
Recent strong heat treatment on the same areaWait until recovered
Lost volume has newly become prominentConsider a volume treatment instead of a device

Recommendations to repeat Density or XERF “every six months” or “twice a year” are custom, not the result of comparative studies. The 2026 study cited to argue that starting early pays off in the long run was computer modelling with no actual people.

Density and XERF duration summary — what is established and what is not

What is established

  • Density follow-up 24 weeks, XERF follow-up 90 days at most
  • RF in general: device measurement 4 weeks · clinical assessment 12 weeks · peak reported at 4–6 months (no control groups)
  • Improvement rates at the same time point differ greatly by rater (92% vs 42%)

What we could not find

  • Six-month or one-year duration data for Density or XERF
  • Studies comparing Density or XERF retreatment intervals
  • Human data showing regular treatment is better in the long run

How long Density and XERF last: frequently asked questions

How many months do Density results last?

Human Density data were followed for only 24 weeks, so there are no data on what happens after that. The four-to-six-month peak reported for RF in general does not come from Density data.

How many months do XERF results last?

The longest follow-up in human XERF data is 90 days. How long XERF lasts beyond that has never been measured, so we do not promise a number of months.

How many times a year should I have Density or XERF?

No study has compared Density or XERF retreatment intervals, so there is no set number. Miso Clinic decides the next session from the state of the face after the assessment two to three months after treatment.

It feels like the effect has gone. Can I have it again straight away?

If it is less than two to three months since Density or XERF, change may still be under way, so we postpone the decision. Comparing photos taken under the same conditions sometimes shows that the feeling and the reality differ.

Can starting early slow ageing?

The 2026 study cited to argue for starting Density or XERF early was computer modelling with no actual people, and all groups converged by year 15. We could not find human data confirming the claim.

Read next

Product pages

Device references: Density · XERF

Who wrote this

Written and reviewed by Lee Chi-Hak, MD, medical director of Miso Clinic in Daegu, South Korea. Every study cited above is given together with its design, its size and the limitations the authors themselves recorded, and where we could not find data, we have said that we could not find any.

Miso Clinic
Medical directorLee Chi-Hak, MD
Address4F Bombom Building, 125 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, South Korea · Exit 1, Kyungpook National University Hospital Station
Phone+82-53-428-2700
HoursWeekdays 11:00–19:00 (lunch 13:00–14:00) / Saturday 10:00–16:00 (no lunch break) / Closed Sundays and public holidays
ColumnsAll clinical columns
Reference libraryAll booster and device references

References

  1. Density human study — Oku K, J Cosmet Dermatol 2025;24(10):e70504, PMID 41090512. 16 adults · one session · 24 weeks · no control group. 3D imaging tightening distance 0.82 ± 0.36 mm; pain 1.4 ± 0.6 (5-point scale).
  2. Three XERF human studies — Hwang JK, Medical Lasers 2025;14(1):23–30 (20 subjects · one session · 12 weeks) · Weiss RA et al., Cureus 2026;18(3):e104546, PMID 41930066 (39 subjects · two sessions · 90 days, manufacturer support) · Erlich G et al., Lasers Med Sci 2026;41(1), PMID 42611100 (retrospective, 16 subjects · one session · 3 months). None of the three has a control group.
  3. Timeline of RF resultsCosmetics 2024;11(3):71 (20 Korean women: clinical assessment not significant at 4 weeks · significant at 12 and 24 weeks; device-measured elasticity from 4 weeks) · Weiss 2026 (84.6% at 30 days → 92.3% at 90 days) · Fitzpatrick 2003 and Edwards AF et al., Dermatol Surg 2013;39:104–110 (peak at 4–6 months). None has a control group.
  4. Improvement rates that depend on the rater — review of 16 ultrasound lifting studies (IJERPH 2023;20(2):1522): at 90 days, practitioners 92% vs patients 42%. Werschler 2016 (20 subjects): at one year, blinded assessment 43% vs patient satisfaction 95–100%; quantified lift was greatest at 90 days and fell to 22–33% at one year.
  5. Miso Clinic clinical protocols — criteria for indications, design by area, and the explanation and consent process before treatment. The source of the sentences marked “clinical judgement” in this column.

Everything in this column is general information and does not replace medical diagnosis or treatment. Effects and side effects vary with individual skin condition, age and underlying illness, and the same result is not guaranteed for everyone. Any decision to proceed should be made in an in-person consultation with a physician.

← Clinical columns · Reference library · Miso Clinic home

한국어 · English · 日本語